Jump to content

My sps tank not using up calcium????


finch6013

Recommended Posts

I have a 34 solana that is about a month old. It has about 20 small colonies and a few frags. I have been testing calcium and alk every day for almost a week and neither of the two seem to be changing. In my 75g that had maybe a little more sps that this one I was dosing almost 100ml per day of two part.

What is going on? why are the corals not using up the calcium? all corals look to be healthy and all the other perams are in check. current calcium is 420ppm, and alk is 8 dkh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well I am using API test kits and I know they are not the best but they have been checked against expensive kits and always have tested the same. These are not new frags, they are my old ones out of my 75g and a few small colonies that are new. None of them are really frags but a few. Thats why I am expecting the calcium to be getting used up like crazy as it did in my old tank. I dont like testing every day expecting it to change one day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

B--your corals aren't up to speed yet...they were in your tank...they were in my tank....they are in your tank....a majority of them are probably catching their breath and will resume going back to normal color and fast growing after they destress...may be another 6 weeks before they start sucking the calcium down again...be patient...

 

Merle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mg is one of the important building blocks of an aragonite based skeleton, along with calcium. Here is a good article how it all ties together snipped from reef central

 

Alkalinity: Most people recommended that we keep out Alk levels at 10-12 dKH. Over time myself and many others, keeping primarily acroporids as well as other SPS, found that the high end of the dKH scale is not always better and that keeping alk closer to natural sea water levels of ~8dKH yielded good, if not better, results for SPS. My personal experience is that I found much less incidence of RTN and my pH became just as stable when balanced with the proper levels of calcium and magnesium. So my recommendation is to keep alk around 8-9 dKH for keeping acroporids. Another nice benefit of lower alk was less precipitate on heaters and pumps.

Quote:

Calcium: And I have had the best success with high levels of calcium between 450 and 500 ppm. I feel that this allows me to get a very good growth in my aquarium. I had kept my calcium levels at around 360-380 for a few years and while this did not cause any problems, my growth wasn't anything to brag about. High ca levels really pushed my growth up a huge notch. Note, that I keep low levels of alk in my tank so that helps me to keep a higher level of ca in the aquarium as well.

Quote:

Magnesium: I personally like to maintain magnesium levels at 1450-1500 ppm. For me that has worked out best. it allows me to easily maintain my alk and ca levels and my corals seem to do best at this level as well.

[...]

The primary benefit of Mg is that it allow calcium and bicarbonate levels in the water to exist at supersaturated levels. In laymen's terms, having high Mg allows you to maintain higher Ca/Alk.

 

Because Ca and bicarbonate are supersaturated, they are always ready to fall out of solution. This is the abiotic precipitation that every talks about on heaters, pumps, and solid surfaces. As calcium carbonate forms on these surfaces, Mg is also able to bond with it. By doing so, Mg blocks Ca and bicarbonate from being able to attach, significantly slowing the rate of precipitation. If you let Mg drop, you have to pour in more and more Ca and Alk supplements, and precipitation becomes more and more of a factor.

 

I don't think corals deliberately use (or require) Mg, it's more of an incidental pick-up while building their skeletons. But, maintaining Mg levels is necessary to hold Ca and Alk levels where you want them.

So... taking all this in, we get the following target ranges:

 

Alk: 7-8 dKH

Ca: 450-500 ppm

Mg: 1450-1500 ppm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Ryan and the Doc. Your corals aren't yet puting any energy into new growth. Basically they are just trying to find out what it takes to live in their new environment and are adjusting accordingly. It takes new corals around 2 months give or take some time depending on the coral before they start putting any of their resources into growout. You should see a slight color up before you see much growth and then you should see a bit of growth and continued color up as they really start growing. I find that after around 8-10 months my corals usually really start to take off. If the tank is well established this time is shortened by a couple of months. My 210g sps dominated display really started to take of in terms of sps growth after the first year. It was starteling to see such an exponental increase in element consumption and growth after only seeing very low or moderate growth rates before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Snorkelwasp

whats your lighting like? if its lacking then that would be another reason they arent putting energy into new growth...or high nitrates, or some other pollutant...basically just look for whatever reason could be stunting their growt..if something is... fix it, and if not just sit back and wait for them to take foot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...